New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CP] 4.9.0 ga #10623
[CP] 4.9.0 ga #10623
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit bd0d06a)
…nt to the new host detail page (cherry picked from commit 38d1581)
(cherry picked from commit 3995b68)
(cherry picked from commit 144ca31)
…e complete mirroring (Katello#10579) (cherry picked from commit 161ccda)
…atello#10588) (cherry picked from commit 56417cc)
* Fixes #36485 - bump recommended repos to 6.14 remove 'ansible-2-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms' from recommended repos remove 'rhel-6-server-els-rpms' from recommended repos (cherry picked from commit 335e1ef)
…ntentSources step (Katello#10582) (cherry picked from commit 8fa12c7)
(cherry picked from commit 07c9896)
…atello#10601) This action used to require edit_organizations permission. With this commit you can download the debug certificate if you have view_organization and export_content permissions. This was done to facilitate downstream users to be able to pull content from an upstream server using network sync (cherry picked from commit fe0481c)
(cherry picked from commit 4c530ae)
…Katello#10604) (cherry picked from commit 85e4eae)
…po hash (cherry picked from commit 03e1186)
Issues: #36482 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR looks good.
Adding [CP] to the PR title prevents updating the issues with the cherry-pick PR and emails to assigned people. 😺 I couldn't find it in the release process notes on a cursory read. Maybe we should add it.
Thanks @sjha4 ! Here it is btw, https://community.theforeman.org/t/katello-4-9-0-ga-release-process/33950 |
@wbclark feel free to merge when ready! |
What are the changes introduced in this pull request?
Considerations taken when implementing this change?
What are the testing steps for this pull request?