Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer: add language about implicit flush and command completion #132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 23, 2017
Merged

GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer: add language about implicit flush and command completion #132

merged 1 commit into from Nov 23, 2017

Conversation

1ace
Copy link
Contributor

@1ace 1ace commented Nov 23, 2017

This pulls in the changes from Ian Romanick (@ianromanick) in Mesa commit
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=1f47388dfebf15f610993f046e1f945024c8fc3c

From Ian's commit:

Copied language from the glXSwapBuffers manual page about the implicit
glFlush and expected command completion. This just codifies what
people already expect from glXCopySubBufferMESA. The intention of
this command is to work like glXSwapBuffers but on a sub-rectangle of
the drawable.

…nd completion

This pulls in the changes from Ian Romanick in Mesa commit
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=1f47388dfebf15f610993f046e1f945024c8fc3c

From Ian's commit:
> Copied language from the glXSwapBuffers manual page about the implicit
> glFlush and expected command completion.  This just codifies what
> people already expect from glXCopySubBufferMESA.  The intention of
> this command is to work like glXSwapBuffers but on a sub-rectangle of
> the drawable.

Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
@oddhack oddhack merged commit 9597a3e into KhronosGroup:master Nov 23, 2017
@1ace 1ace deleted the update/GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer branch November 23, 2017 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants