Add SKY65605-21

[pbn4]

Add SKY65605-21

---

URL: http://www.skyworksinc.com/uploads/documents/SKY65605_21_203118F.pdf (page 6)

I have run check_kicad_mod.py but I don't know what to do with the output:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "check_kicad_mod.py", line 117, in <module>
    rule.check()
  File "/home/michal/kicad-library-utils/pcb/rules/G1_7.py", line 17, in check
    if 'linux' in platform.platform().lower() and not checkLineEndings(self.module.filename):
  File "/home/michal/kicad-library-utils/common/rulebase.py", line 75, in checkLineEndings
    LE1 = ord(chr(filecontentsraw[-2]))
TypeError: an integer is required

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[evanshultz]

Thanks for contributing and welcome!

Before we can move forward we need for you to please sign the CLA. Let us know if you have any problems getting that done.

That error you posted above is a problem with our CI which should hopefully be resolved by closing and re-opening. Hang on...

[evanshultz]

How did you make this footprint? I don't see a recommended one in the datasheet. Is there another document you used to generate it? Or, just guessing because of the round rect pads, did you use our LGA footprint generator?

[pbn4]

When I get to the CLA site it says I already signed.

How did you make this footprint? I don't see a recommended one in the datasheet. Is there another document you used to generate it? Or, just guessing because of the round rect pads, did you use our LGA footprint generator?

Right, there is no recommended footprint for this one, I did it by analogy to SKY65504 pull request, including comments.

[evanshultz]

The part in the PR you reference has a recommended footprint in that datasheet. This part, unless I've missed it, does not have a recommended footprint.

And there is insufficient info in the datasheet to use our IPC-compliant scripts to make a footprint.

So... how do you want to proceed? Perhaps asking Skyworks?

[pbn4]

I asked them to provide recommended footprint just now. I'll report back the progress.

[pbn4]

@evanshultz I got response from Skyworks:

I applied the changes just now.

[pbn4]

[pbn4]

Now I noticed that pin 1 silkscreen designation is on the wrong side, right?

[evanshultz]

It looks OK to me. Can you point out the issue you're seeing?

Please shrink the fab layer ref des so it fits within the body.

[pbn4]

[pbn4]

Travis complains about shrinking the ref.

[evanshultz]

@pbn4
Are you still around? If we can wrap this up quickly it can be merged before all PRs are closed due to moving to GitLab. We don't have much time.

Because this part is so small. https://kicad-pcb.org/libraries/klc/F5.2/ says that 0.5mm - 1mm are allowed, and this one is 0.4mm and still far too big for the part. That being said, here is the 0402 capacitor footprint and it's much smaller:

So go ahead and squash the fab ref des down a bit more.

And please let me know the pin1 issue you noted above. I'm not getting it.

Lastly, there is an issue Travis caught with the 3D model name. Please correct that.