This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 27, 2021. It is now read-only.
Added a few ancient motorola parts. #895
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
January 9, 2017 07:27
… 6850. Also made 6821 KLC compliant.
|
Hi! this is a rather large effort, so it'll take some time to look through it ... one thing I already noted: Best, |
Added MC6843. An old Floppy disc controller. Pins arranged as in the databook from 1982. That is, with pins to the left for the computer side and points to thr right for the floppy drive side. Added 6844. An old DMA disc controller. No symbol in the databook. Arranged with inputs and bidirectional pins to the left and outputs to the right. At least mostly I think. I get complains from the checker about pin names against pin type. This is probably due to IRQ pin beeing an output or open collector on some devices. It really is. The checker also complains about reference and name position. But I let the script place these by itself (--fix) and still it complains after the next session in the library editor. The EC01 error prevents me from wanting to run --fix again.
|
Powerpins are now visible as requested. Also added two more chips. The MC6843 floppy controller and MC6844 DMA controller. There is no need to hurry. I added some of these because they were missing and used in an old piece of hardware I am reverse engineering for the fun of it.
|
|
hi1 to start with this, I rand out check-scripts. Please fix the issues named in their output: Generally:
Best, |
Added footprint filter as best as I could. Does not seem to work however so probably not correct.
|
Removed the rings for pins with the bar over the name. I agree that this is how it should be an now the complaints about name vs pintype is gone. However, I added the rings since I looked at the zilog library which is said to be 100% KLC compliant... I also added a footprint filter but I expect this to be incorrect. When testing it does not seem to work. If I add one of the smaller ICs (6840, 6850) it still suggests 40pin dip in my tests. |
|
Hi! first of all: please fix the conflict!
best, |
Merged
|
This push can be closed and deleted |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
More precisely
6800, 6809, 6809E, 6840, 6845 and 6850. These are prefixed with MC as they are called in the 1982 microprocessors data manual. The base number added as a keyword for easy finding of all speed variants in library browser.
Also made 6821 KLC compliant but name not updated.