Minor tweaks & clang++ support & fixes.

[dkorolev]

No description provided.

[biodranik]

What does ?= mean?

[dkorolev]

Set unless already set in the environment.

This syntax makes make use g++ and CPLUSPLUS=clang++ make use clang++, for this Makefile and all Makefiles invoked from it.

(Edit: It also respects export CPLUSPLUS=clang++ in the environment, of course.)

[biodranik]

Thread local does not work on android

[dkorolev]

Bummer, PTAL @deathbaba .

[dkorolev]

Two questions, actually:

1. Is there a c++11-standard way to tell whether thread_local is supported at compile time?
2. Perhaps I could just use plain std::chrono-s implementation of Now() for Android then, w/o any monotonic magic?

(Side note: MILLISECOND_INTERVAL is signed in Bricks, so time going backwards by a millisecond should not hurt FSQ.)

[biodranik]

1 no
2 yes

On 21.12.2014, at 11.27, Dima notifications@github.com wrote:

Two questions, actually:

Is there a c++11-standard way to tell whether thread_local is supported at compile time?
Perhaps I could just use plain std::chrono-s implementation of Now() for Android then, w/o any monotonic magic?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[dkorolev]

Done, PTAL.

Thanks,
Dima

http://dimakorolev.com/ | http://www.linkedin.com/in/dimakorolev |
dmitry.korolev@gmail.com | +1 (312) 593 2783

On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Alex Zolotarev notifications@github.com
wrote:

1 no
2 yes

On 21.12.2014, at 11.27, Dima notifications@github.com wrote:

Two questions, actually:

Is there a c++11-standard way to tell whether thread_local is supported
at compile time?
Perhaps I could just use plain std::chrono-s implementation of Now() for
Android then, w/o any monotonic magic?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#12 (comment).