Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NullPointerExceptio at org.elixir_lang.mix.Project$createModulesForOtpApps$3.run(Project.kt:90) #1871

Closed
venriq opened this issue Jan 11, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1878
Closed
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@venriq
Copy link

venriq commented Jan 11, 2021

Version

11.9.0

What I was doing

I don't know what I was doing

Exceptions

Exception 0

Stacktrace

java.lang.NullPointerException
	at org.elixir_lang.mix.Project$createModulesForOtpApps$3.run(Project.kt:90)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager$TaskRunnable.run(CoreProgressManager.java:962)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager$4.run(CoreProgressManager.java:520)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$new$0(ProgressRunner.java:79)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$3(ProgressRunner.java:235)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.lambda$runProcess$2(CoreProgressManager.java:178)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.registerIndicatorAndRun(CoreProgressManager.java:658)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.executeProcessUnderProgress(CoreProgressManager.java:610)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressManagerImpl.executeProcessUnderProgress(ProgressManagerImpl.java:65)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.runProcess(CoreProgressManager.java:165)
	at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.ProgressRunner.lambda$submit$4(ProgressRunner.java:235)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1700)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:668)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:665)
	at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1.run(Executors.java:665)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
@KronicDeth KronicDeth changed the title [auto-generated] java.lang.NullPointerException NullPointerExceptio at org.elixir_lang.mix.Project$createModulesForOtpApps$3.run(Project.kt:90) Jan 12, 2021
@KronicDeth KronicDeth added this to the 11.10.0 milestone Jan 12, 2021
@KronicDeth KronicDeth self-assigned this Jan 15, 2021
KronicDeth added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 15, 2021
Fixes #1871

`DepsWatcher` was converted to a Project Listener in #1844 to support installing the plugin from the Marketplace without reloading, but some references to `DepsWatcher` were still trying to get its instance for project using `project.getComponent()`, which would now return `null`.
KronicDeth added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 15, 2021
Fixes #1871

`DepsWatcher` was converted to a Project Listener in #1844 to support installing the plugin from the Marketplace without reloading, but some references to `DepsWatcher` were still trying to get its instance for project using `project.getComponent()`, which would now return `null`.
KronicDeth added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 15, 2021
Fixes #1871

`DepsWatcher` was converted to a Project Listener in #1844 to support installing the plugin from the Marketplace without reloading, but some references to `DepsWatcher` were still trying to get its instance for project using `project.getComponent()`, which would now return `null`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants