[WIP] CI hooks coveralls to jest coverage #36
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ndushay
changed the title
ndushay
changed the title
ndushay
force-pushed
the
ci-w-eslint
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0f81664
to
25495e8
Compare
|
Didn't mean to close this branch; reviewing now |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WIP until #35 is merged.
If this works like our ruby projects, the PR will fail if the coverage drops. (Can't really drop much below 0, tho!). We should be able to configure coveralls in a variety of ways (how much % change do we care about, what is our threshhold, etc.).
Closes #14