2% trimmed means?

[JohnAtl]

Hello,
It seems in limo_robust_rep_anova, the argument '2' to limo_trimmed_mean() would yield 2% trimmed means, rather than the customary 20%. Is this correct?
Thanks

limo_tools/limo_robust_rep_anova.m

Line 124 in bba57e3

y = squeeze(limo_trimmed_mean(Data,2)); % these are the means to compare

[CPernet]

oops yes, indeed thx for spotting it
please be very careful with this function, it's not validated yet (you can see it not called by any other functions, not is in the wiki) -- one factor works that's pretty much it

[CPernet]

pushed the changes in both master and hotfixes, thx

[JohnAtl]

Hi Cyril, limo_trimmed_mean is called from limo_robust_rep_anova, which is what I was really interested in. (Although I can't figure out the structure for Data, since it is time x subject x measures, but represents more than one condition. Any suggestions?) Has limo_rep_anova not been validated? Do you have suggestions for robust anova and post-hoc tests on related/dependent data? (It doesn't fit in study since each sample is taken at a different time point, depending on subjects' movement.) Struggling grad student with non-normal EEG data would be most grateful for suggestions. Thanks, John

…

On May 2, 2021, at 1:06 AM, Cyril Pernet ***@***.***> wrote: oops yes, indeed thx for spotting it please be very careful with this function, it's not validated yet (you can see it not called by any other functions, not is in the wiki) -- one factor works that's pretty much it — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#68 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLUQCVC4HMCZ4LHZX5UUQ3TLTMT7ANCNFSM434U6CPQ>.