-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
verify for structured options for adjsets #374
Conversation
…ssed refinements (circa 5/29).
* Made some minor improvements to the automated structured AMR schema generation code.
…blems when setting an existing object/list node to a scalar type.
…tor to simplify code.
@nselliott we are getting close on this one - I exported this to VisIt and noticed gaps between the domains: Maybe a simple indexing fix is needed? |
I've seen this before. Perhaps, it is related to node-based partitioning vs. cell-based partitioning. Some codes may partition nodes (instead of cells) to different domains. Thereby, there exists a cell that spans two different domains, which, creates those gaps when visualized. |
@gzagaris yes, I have seen things like this before as well. this is an example mesh, i think this is just a simple index issue. Right now the set of domains aren't presenting topology covering those gaps. |
@cyrush That should be fixed now--I had the wrong size for the uniform coordsets. |
@cyrush This PR is updated to include refinement ratios in structured adjsets, to identify differing resolutions between neighboring domains. |
@nselliott took this for a spin, looks good to me. |
No description provided.