-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dirichlet boundary conditions #5
Comments
Hi. No, unfortunately it is not possible.
2017-11-17 4:53 GMT+01:00 Marius <notifications@github.com>:
… Hi,
Is it possible to define the values of phi on the boundary when using
Dirichlet boundary conditions ?
best
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAskEXq4mJdbPXN1EENOoA58eYOVAAX8ks5s3QNJgaJpZM4QhgGP>
.
|
Hi, This is a follow-up of negf's question. Does this solver only handle homogeneous Dirichlet and Neumann conditions (i. e. phi = 0 and dphi/dn = 0)? Is it possible to implement non-homogeneous boundary conditions? Thanks |
Helo, this is not possible with the FFT method.
Vladimir
Dne čt 3. 12. 2020 22:19 uživatel loujincheng1005 <notifications@github.com>
napsal:
… Hi,
This is a follow-up of negf's question. Do this solver only handle
homogeneous Dirichlet and Neumann conditions (i. e. phi = 0 and dphi/dn =
0)? Is it possible to implement non-homogeneous boundary conditions?
Thanks
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFSIEJG2KSNST5UBGS5VELSS76EPANCNFSM4EEGAGHQ>
.
|
Thank you for letting me know:) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
Is it possible to define the values of phi on the boundary when using Dirichlet boundary conditions ?
best
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: