move poly to MakieCore

[jw3126]

JuliaGeo/GeoInterface.jl#71 (comment)

[jw3126]

Bump! Is there some arguments against this? Would be really helpful for us to have lightweight access to poly.

[SimonDanisch]

Yes, thank you, I think this is a good idea, although it's not really clear on where to draw the line... But lets just merge this for now, if it helps your use case! :)

[jw3126]

@SimonDanisch thanks for merging! What are the downsides of declaring more polytypes in MakieCore?

[jkrumbiegel]

it's just that makiecore is supposed to be lightweight, and the more we add the less it is that

[SimonDanisch]

Also we really want to start having a "real" solution, where you can just address any plot/recipe without taking on the dependency ;)

[jw3126]

Also we really want to start having a "real" solution, where you can just address any plot/recipe without taking on the dependency ;)

Sounds awesome!

[jw3126]

it's just that makiecore is supposed to be lightweight, and the more we add the less it is that

But do @recipe calls make the package more heavy weight? I am not talking about moving any implementations to MakieCore. Just adding more "some docs" @recipe(...) to MakieCore.

[SimonDanisch]

I don't really think it matters in this case, and won't for a couple more, as long as we don't need further package dependencies. It'll just a bit random, which recipes make it into the exclusive MakieCore club ;)

[jw3126]

Can we have a MakieCore release? Should I bump the version?