Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to DelaunayTriangulation v1.0 #3787

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

DanielVandH
Copy link
Contributor

This contains all the changes needed to upgrade to DelaunayTriangulation v1.0.

Once this has been merged, could a new release be made when possible please?

@DanielVandH
Copy link
Contributor Author

Why is the CI not updating the registry to recognise v1 as a possible version?

@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member

It might be a cache issue, I've purged some so let's see how these new CI runs go

@DanielVandH
Copy link
Contributor Author

Still nothing. Is there something I need to do different?

@jkrumbiegel jkrumbiegel reopened this Apr 17, 2024
@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member

The figure

Voronoiplot for a centroidal tessellation with an automatic colormap.png

is failing reference image tests.

@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member

Screenshot 2024-04-17 at 2 34 19 PM this PR on the left, master on the right

@DanielVandH
Copy link
Contributor Author

DanielVandH commented Apr 17, 2024

The new image looks fine, it can be replaced. The refinement algorithm between v1 and v0.8 has changed and so the order of the points is also different, giving different colors; the left image also has 96 generators while the right has 98.

@DanielVandH DanielVandH reopened this Apr 21, 2024
@DanielVandH
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is that image the only issue? Seems from the CI that once it's replaced this should be good to go?

@t-bltg t-bltg added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Apr 27, 2024
@DanielVandH
Copy link
Contributor Author

Any update on this?

@jkrumbiegel
Copy link
Member

I think because it did cause different visuals it was considered breaking? So my understanding was it could go into 0.21

@DanielVandH
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is it really different visuals? It's the same output for an identical triangulation, e.g. triplot(points) is always the same. The only difference is if someone did refine! before trying to plot (which is never done by triplot itself), and even then the difference is small.

@jkrumbiegel
Copy link
Member

Oh ok I didn't know that the changes were dependent on refine!. That's ok then, as far as I'm concerned, as people using refine! must've loaded DelaunayTriangulation and are therefore subject to its versioning.

@asinghvi17 asinghvi17 changed the base branch from master to v0.20.10 April 29, 2024 14:19
@asinghvi17 asinghvi17 merged commit 3c9dde7 into MakieOrg:v0.20.10 Apr 29, 2024
19 of 52 checks passed
@asinghvi17
Copy link
Member

Merged into #3814

SimonDanisch added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
* Upgrade to DelaunayTriangulation v1.0 (#3787)

* Upgrade to DelaunayTriangulation v1.0

* Updates for DelaunayTriangulation v1.0

* changelog

* Allow Cairo scatter marker conversion to be overridden (#3811)

* Define cairo_scatter_marker api

* Bump CairoMakie version

* Implement cairo_scatter_marker API for scatter and meshscatter

* Add to changelog

* MeshScatter conversion is different, don't implement

* fix ticks for categorical colorbar (#3762)

* Update tricontourf.md in 0.20.10 branch (#3828)

Update tricontourf.md

* fix docs

---------

Co-authored-by: Daniel VandenHeuvel <95613936+DanielVandH@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon <sdanisch@protonmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants