Add capability values schema as jsonb field to storage models #676
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
galoiring
changed the title
galoiring
changed the title
galoiring
force-pushed
the
add_capabilities_to_jsonb
branch
from
d792ab3
to
cee2010
Compare
agrare
reviewed
Dec 5, 2022
db/migrate/20221116104013_add_capabilities_to_physical_storage_models.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…orage family, storage services and storage resources
galoiring
force-pushed
the
add_capabilities_to_jsonb
branch
from
70429c3
to
32c88ec
Compare
|
Checked commit Autosde@32c88ec with ruby 2.6.10, rubocop 1.28.2, haml-lint 0.35.0, and yamllint |
agrare
approved these changes
Dec 6, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We added capability values schema as jsonb field to physical storage, storage family, storage services and storage resources as requested by @agrare .
related pr: ManageIQ/manageiq-api#1190
W/ @OrGur1987