New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update translations from 10/26 English catalog #22781
Update translations from 10/26 English catalog #22781
Conversation
I'm going to try to see if I can manually delete these commented file/line number lines as a first commit and then apply the downloaded translations on top so the second commit can be reviewed separately. |
``` % git diff --cached --numstat 335 12 locale/de/manageiq.po 332 12 locale/es/manageiq.po 342 18 locale/fr/manageiq.po 334 13 locale/it/manageiq.po 330 13 locale/ja/manageiq.po 330 13 locale/ko/manageiq.po 332 12 locale/pt_BR/manageiq.po 329 12 locale/zh_CN/manageiq.po 330 13 locale/zh_TW/manageiq.po ```
aea9a0c
to
390451a
Compare
Checked commits jrafanie/manageiq@cdfb20b~...390451a with ruby 2.6.10, rubocop 1.28.2, haml-lint 0.35.0, and yamllint |
The absolute KING of deletions 👑 ✂️ ✂️ ✂️ 🔥 🔥 🔥 🗑️ 🗑️ 🗑️ |
English: ManageIQ/manageiq#22770 Translations: ManageIQ/manageiq#22781 Note, I've locally reverted the changes to the english files as ManageIQ/manageiq#22777 was merged too early. We'll get these changes in the next cut.
Semi-related to #22217 - I'm still thinking we should just remove the file/line numbers from the .pot file as well. Regardless, we definitely don't need them in the .po files, so I'm very 👍 on this PR |
🤣 If only they were "real" deletions |
Backported to
|
…er_22770 Update translations from 10/26 English catalog (cherry picked from commit e2d7b1f)
Based on english updated in #22770
Note, the first commit removes all of the commented file: line numbers.
See the second commit for the content changes.