Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor Mapstories + Storyframes + Storypins Apps #1189

Merged
merged 14 commits into from Feb 6, 2018

Conversation

Coop56
Copy link
Contributor

@Coop56 Coop56 commented Jan 22, 2018

This PR refactors the naming used in the mapstories, storyframes and storypins apps. They were previously called boxes and annotations which did not line up with what we called these features. This must be merged at the same time as this MapLoom PR. MapStory/MapLoom#42

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 24, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 68.595% when pulling 2590e19 on refactor-mapstories-app into 97d0ee6 on master.

Copy link
Member

@cuttlefish cuttlefish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are these migrations.RenameModel()s sufficient? They handle renaming the tables and migrating the data?
Sorry getting staging back up is taking a while. I'm getting distracted by other things. But I'd like to run it on staging before we do it on prod.

@Coop56
Copy link
Contributor Author

Coop56 commented Jan 24, 2018

Yes the migrations should do what we need. It'll rename the database tables without deleting the data. I tested it locally, but I would agree testing it on staging (after staging has some stories with layers, pins and frames) makes sense.

@cuttlefish cuttlefish merged commit 979cb87 into master Feb 6, 2018
@cuttlefish cuttlefish deleted the refactor-mapstories-app branch February 6, 2018 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants