Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added support for hosting website via nginx docker #153

Merged

Conversation

OwenTruong
Copy link

Added support for hosting website via nginx docker

Pull Request Type

  • Bugfix
  • Feature Implementation
  • Documentation
  • Other

Related issue

#129

Description

Provide support to dockerize FreeTubeCordova.

Added Dockerfile, dockerignore, and modified README.md to add instructions on how to create and run images locally and by Docker Hub. FreeTubeCordova should replace the image, "owentruong/freetubecordova", in the PR's readme with its own published image if available.

Screenshots

Screen Shot 2023-06-10 at 4 32 27 PM

Testing

Subscription and video works when tested locally in Chrome, Firefox and Safari.

Desktop

  • OS: MacOS
  • OS Version: 12.6.6
  • FreeTube version: 0.18.0

@MarmadileManteater MarmadileManteater self-assigned this Jun 15, 2023
@MarmadileManteater MarmadileManteater linked an issue Jun 22, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
@OwenTruong OwenTruong closed this Jun 27, 2023
@OwenTruong OwenTruong deleted the dockerize branch June 27, 2023 16:11
@OwenTruong OwenTruong restored the dockerize branch June 27, 2023 16:14
@OwenTruong
Copy link
Author

Apologies, I did not mean to close / delete my docker branch.

@MarmadileManteater
Copy link
Owner

You are valid. I like this PR. I sat on it for a while because I'm not super familiar with docker (then I went on 🏝vacation for a week).

Dockerfile Outdated
WORKDIR /app
COPY package.json ./package.json
COPY yarn.lock ./yarn.lock
RUN yarn install
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
RUN yarn install
# git is needed to install `jinter` from github
RUN apk add git
RUN if [ ! -d 'node_modules' ]; then yarn ci; fi

I got the error: #0 12.23 error Couldn't find the binary git when I tested this merged into the latest commit on development.

This is because, since this PR was made, I added the development version of Jinter as a dependency (it fixes a bug that was preventing building with the latest version of YouTube.js), so I believe this will also need to have git installed as a dep for the time being.

Additionally, I like the idea of being able to pass in the existing packed directory instead of rebuilding (because that would make it easier to throw this into the existing CI)

Dockerfile Outdated
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
COPY --from=dep /app/node_modules ./node_modules
RUN yarn pack:web

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
RUN yarn pack:web
COPY --from=dep /app/dis[t]/web ./dist/web
# don't rebuild if you don't have to
RUN if [ ! -d 'dist/web' ]; then yarn pack:web; fi

This goes along with my comment about using an existing directory.

@MarmadileManteater
Copy link
Owner

MarmadileManteater commented Jun 27, 2023

Sorry if that was a little stilted or out of order, but I basically just modified what you have locally until I got something I could easily run in the releaseCordova.yml and buildCordova.yml workflows without packing another time, and then, I made the suggestions, but this is the complete file I have on my end that I was testing with just in case I suggested something incorrectly:

FROM node:18-alpine AS dep
WORKDIR /app
COPY package.json ./package.json
COPY yarn.lock ./yarn.lock
# copy `dist` if it exists already
COPY dis[t]/web ./dist/
COPY node_module[s] ./node_modules
# git is needed for jinter
RUN apk add git
# don't rebuild if you don't have to
RUN if [ ! -d 'node_modules' ]; then yarn ci; fi

FROM node:18-alpine AS build
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
COPY --from=dep /app/dis[t]/web ./dist/web
COPY --from=dep /app/node_module[s] ./node_modules
# don't rebuild if you don't have to
RUN if [ ! -d 'dist/web' ]; then yarn pack:web; fi
# Removing node_modules and src at build stage to reduce image size.
RUN rm -r node_modules src


FROM nginx:latest as app
COPY --from=build /app/dist/web /usr/share/nginx/html

@OwenTruong
Copy link
Author

OwenTruong commented Jun 27, 2023

Sorry if that was a little stilted or out of order, but I basically just modified what you have locally until I got something I could easily run in the releaseCordova.yml and buildCordova.yml workflows without packing another time, and then, I made the suggestions, but this is the complete file I have on my end that I was testing with just in case I suggested something incorrectly:

FROM node:18-alpine AS dep
WORKDIR /app
COPY package.json ./package.json
COPY yarn.lock ./yarn.lock
# copy `dist` if it exists already
COPY dis[t]/web ./dist/
COPY node_module[s] ./node_modules
# git is needed for jinter
RUN apk add git
# don't rebuild if you don't have to
RUN if [ ! -d 'node_modules' ]; then yarn ci; fi

FROM node:18-alpine AS build
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
COPY --from=dep /app/dis[t]/web ./dist/web
COPY --from=dep /app/node_module[s] ./node_modules
# don't rebuild if you don't have to
RUN if [ ! -d 'dist/web' ]; then yarn pack:web; fi
# Removing node_modules and src at build stage to reduce image size.
RUN rm -r node_modules src


FROM nginx:latest as app
COPY --from=build /app/dist/web /usr/share/nginx/html

No worries and thanks for looking at my commit! Your edit looks good! I did not think about skipping install or build if node_modules and/or dist already exist as there might be conflict between different OS/kernel and architecture, but since Node is multi-arch, I do not think it matters at all?

I believe we also do not need the following line below.

RUN rm -r node_modules src

I have recently learned that in multi-staged builds (build files with multiple FROM statements / bases), all previous stages except the file stage is removed from the final image, so in this case, only the app stage will be bundled in the image. Dep and build stage will be removed automatically.

Link for more info on multi-staged build only bundling the last stage.

With multi-stage builds, you use multiple FROM statements in your Dockerfile. Each FROM instruction can use a different base, and each of them begins a new stage of the build. You can selectively copy artifacts from one stage to another, leaving behind everything you don’t want in the final image.

@OwenTruong
Copy link
Author

OwenTruong commented Jun 27, 2023

I'll make the changes and commit to my branch!

Besides that, there were two concerns that made me think my PR might not completely resolve issue #129.

First, I want to create persistent storage for the docker container by allowing users to either bind directories (mounting a host directory in container) or create docker volumes for the config directory (folder with profiles.db and etc. files) in the container. This makes the container and data portable and easy to manage for backup and on the off change the container is corrupted or accidentally deleted. However, I am not sure where all the config files are located in.

According to FreeTube's documentation, it is located in "~/.config/FreeTube", but since this is a docker container, there is only the root user and I do not see a .config at root directory. However, data seems to persist even when I shutdown the container and start it again, so it is definitely saved somewhere in disk and not in RAM. If you have an idea at where the config is located in that would be great 😁.

Second, might be a good idea to add in a login/password as some of us have other people (like family or friends) on the local network, and prefer to not let them snoop in on what we are watching. This could be done by creating a separate login page with either a GUI or an alert function that asks for username and password specified when the docker container is created (we could pass the container a USERNAME and PASSWD environment variable).

@OwenTruong
Copy link
Author

OwenTruong commented Jun 28, 2023

The changes are working on my end too.

Sorry if that was a little stilted or out of order, but I basically just modified what you have locally until I got something I could easily run in the releaseCordova.yml and buildCordova.yml workflows without packing another time, and then, I made the suggestions, but this is the complete file I have on my end that I was testing with just in case I suggested something incorrectly:

FROM node:18-alpine AS dep
WORKDIR /app
COPY package.json ./package.json
COPY yarn.lock ./yarn.lock
# copy `dist` if it exists already
COPY dis[t]/web ./dist/
COPY node_module[s] ./node_modules
# git is needed for jinter
RUN apk add git
# don't rebuild if you don't have to
RUN if [ ! -d 'node_modules' ]; then yarn ci; fi

FROM node:18-alpine AS build
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
COPY --from=dep /app/dis[t]/web ./dist/web
COPY --from=dep /app/node_module[s] ./node_modules
# don't rebuild if you don't have to
RUN if [ ! -d 'dist/web' ]; then yarn pack:web; fi
# Removing node_modules and src at build stage to reduce image size.
RUN rm -r node_modules src


FROM nginx:latest as app
COPY --from=build /app/dist/web /usr/share/nginx/html

I have modified the Dockerfile to your suggestion! I also kind of like the ability to copy the node_modules and dist from host if available. It really helps to speed up the dep and build stages, as "yarn ci" and "yarn pack:web" can take a while to run. Running these two instructions on the host is a lot faster!

There is a way to speed up the two instructions, but it is a bit complicated to set it up.

@OwenTruong
Copy link
Author

OwenTruong commented Jun 28, 2023

For some reason, data like subscription and favorites persist on my machine even when I delete and restart the container... I did not add bind mount or volume...

Where does FreeTubeCordova put their config files in? I tried to use find and grep command inside the container and in host, but was not able to find the files.

@ChunkyProgrammer
Copy link

Could it be saved as cookies (i dont know too much about the docker setup)

@OwenTruong
Copy link
Author

OwenTruong commented Jun 28, 2023

Could it be saved as cookies (i dont know too much about the docker setup)

My apologies, I am not too familiar with FreeTube, and I was a bit confused. I just checked my subscriptions in Firefox and Safari and they are different.

It makes sense to me now. There was probably a low chance of a website having the permission to access a config folder on a computer. It made more sense for the config to be stored in the browser's cache.. Thanks!

@ChunkyProgrammer
Copy link

ChunkyProgrammer commented Jun 28, 2023

Looks like it's saved to IndexedDB when using the web build
image

Dockerfile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Dockerfile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Emma <MarmadileManteater@proton.me>
@OwenTruong
Copy link
Author

Great, changes committed!

@OwenTruong
Copy link
Author

Apologies. For some reason, some of the changes we discussed before were not added to the pull request.

I have reopened the request with some addition changes besides the one we have discussed. One problem is that conditional copy instruction does not exist in Docker so that means it is not possible to copy ./dist/web if it already exist on host.

@MarmadileManteater
Copy link
Owner

I actually accidentally merged in like half of this a while back, and then, I took a break for a while, so I need to go back and clean some stuff up, but then, this should be getting fully merged.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

@MarmadileManteater
Copy link
Owner

Looking this back over, I noticed you removed the glob pattern, and you left a comment saying that "There are no conditional copy instructions in Docker", but as far as I understood, glob patterns could be used to achieve a copy that doesn't fail if the file doesn't exist to copy. I guess I am just confused because they appeared to work the way I expected them to. If there is some reason that the conditional copy shouldn't be done or wouldn't work right that I am not understanding, could you explain more? It would just make the CI faster if it doesn't have to redo work.

@OwenTruong
Copy link
Author

OwenTruong commented Aug 31, 2023

Looking this back over, I noticed you removed the glob pattern, and you left a comment saying that "There are no conditional copy instructions in Docker", but as far as I understood, glob patterns could be used to achieve a copy that doesn't fail if the file doesn't exist to copy. I guess I am just confused because they appeared to work the way I expected them to. If there is some reason that the conditional copy shouldn't be done or wouldn't work right that I am not understanding, could you explain more? It would just make the CI faster if it doesn't have to redo work.

Ah sorry, that is completely my fault. I was testing the Dockerfile in Podman (an open source alternative to Docker), and it does not support conditional instructions. Conditionals should work normally in Docker.

I will move the head back to the correct commit I made on my fork's dockerize branch a few days ago. Maybe I should use git revert instead. It is a bit safer.

@github-actions
Copy link

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2023

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2023

Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.

Dockerfile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Emma <MarmadileManteater@proton.me>
@MarmadileManteater MarmadileManteater merged commit cc2e8f5 into MarmadileManteater:development Oct 11, 2023
1 check passed
@MarmadileManteater
Copy link
Owner

Sorry, that this took absolute ages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request]: Self Hosting on Docker
3 participants