When using this content PLEASE CITE the paper (link will be added soon)) and this repository.
Data:
- Fig_4c.csv: source data provided by Alam et al. (2024, Nature)
- rebuttal_fig_2.csv: source data provided by Alam et al. (2024, Nature) and data measured by us from their Extended Data Fig. 6 (green versus black bars during playback)
R-scripts used in the analysis:
- Fig_point_1.r uses Fig_4c.csv and generates our Fig. 1; columns: tutor - unique tutor ID, pupil - unique pupil ID for the given tutor, tutor_path - song path length of the tutor, pupil_path - song path length of the pupil
- Fig_point_2.r uses rebuttal_fig_2.csv and generates our Fig. 2; columns: trial_id - unique trial ID, side_bias - was the long-path song during the trial played in the preferred arm or non-preferred arm by the female during the baseline period?, song_pair - unique song-pair ID; long - path length of the long path song, short - path length of the short path song, pre - the percentage of pre-trial time spent in the arm where long path song would be played during the trial, trial - the percentage of trial time spent in the arm with long path song, post - the percentage of post-trial time spent in the arm where long path song was played during the trial, trial_long - trial time spent in the arm with long path song, trial_short - trial time spent in the arm with short path song
Output: contains the generated figures in PNG format
LICENSE: terms of reuse