Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve relationship declaration #57

Conversation

chuck-alt-delete
Copy link
Collaborator

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • ♻️ Refactor
  • ✨ Feature
  • 🐛 Bug Fix
  • 👷 Optimization
  • 📝 Documentation Update
  • 🚩 Other

Description

See

Related Tickets & Documents

closes #53

Added to documentation?

  • 📜 readme
  • 🙅 no documentation needed

[optional] What gif best describes this PR or how it makes you feel?

Copy link
Collaborator

@bobbyiliev bobbyiliev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would this work if we had multiple child elements? Let's say a user has posts and videos for example

@chuck-alt-delete
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I’m thinking for multiple child elements, you would have multiple entries in the relationships list

@chuck-alt-delete chuck-alt-delete merged commit 7883af9 into MaterializeInc:main Mar 4, 2023
@chuck-alt-delete chuck-alt-delete deleted the feature/improve-relationships branch March 10, 2023 19:27
recursethis pushed a commit to recursethis/materialize-datagen that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature: More flexible relationships
2 participants