Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[43.10 AtB] adjust contract pay doesn't seem to work #729

Closed
bczretribution opened this issue May 18, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

[43.10 AtB] adjust contract pay doesn't seem to work #729

bczretribution opened this issue May 18, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@bczretribution
Copy link

Environment

43.10

Description

the "adjust contract payment for deployment limits" option in the AtB tab of the options seems to be nonfunctioning. By its description, when it is selected it is supposed to identify when the leader's strategy skill allows fewer units to be deployed than a contract requires and adjust the contract's requirements and pay to match the strategy limit. In the attached campaign contracts are generated requiring 9 lances be deployed by the leader's strategy limits deployment to 6. the contracts, however, seem to continue to require 9 units be deployed.

Files

glitch.zip

@neoancient neoancient added the AtB label Jun 10, 2018
@neoancient neoancient added this to the Development 0.45 milestone Jun 10, 2018
bandildo added a commit to bandildo/mekhq that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2018
@bczretribution
Copy link
Author

glitch.zip

many of the customs listed on that screenshot were in the files that were sent, this is every custom I have if this doesn't work then there would appear to be an issue with loading customs (this has happened once before with one of my bugs)

@bandildo
Copy link
Collaborator

@bczretribution in the first zip you only included "Aegis Consulting", I've noticed the ones missing are included in your second zip. I guess you just forgot to copy "The Cavalry", but no worries: I managed to circumvent the issue and the fix is pending now in #812 :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants