Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENH: Add scheduler_cycles #106

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 18, 2022
Merged

ENH: Add scheduler_cycles #106

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 18, 2022

Conversation

Miksus
Copy link
Owner

@Miksus Miksus commented Sep 18, 2022

No description provided.

@Miksus Miksus added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 18, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 18, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 95.50% // Head: 95.51% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (18617fe) compared to base (819fa85).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #106   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.50%   95.51%           
=======================================
  Files          88       88           
  Lines        4605     4612    +7     
=======================================
+ Hits         4398     4405    +7     
  Misses        207      207           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
rocketry/conditions/scheduler.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
rocketry/conds/__init__.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
rocketry/conditions/api.py 98.68% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@Miksus Miksus merged commit a8e509b into master Sep 18, 2022
@Miksus Miksus deleted the dev/scheduler_cycle branch September 18, 2022 07:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants