Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[1.18.1~ 1.19.x] Forge is not compatible with Openj9 17 #9408

Closed
safesaffawa opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

[1.18.1~ 1.19.x] Forge is not compatible with Openj9 17 #9408

safesaffawa opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
Wont Fix/Works As Intended This request reports something that would break expectations in order to fix.

Comments

@safesaffawa
Copy link

Minecraft Version: 1.18.1~1.19.4

Forge Version: 39.1.1~45.0.18 :(

Logs:
1.18.1-Forge_39.1.1.txt

1.19.4-Forge_45.0.13.txt

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Start with openj9 17
  2. Collapse

Description of issue:

@safesaffawa safesaffawa added the Triage This request requires the active attention of the Triage Team. Requires labelling or reviews. label Mar 21, 2023
@safesaffawa safesaffawa changed the title Openj9 cannot be used on forge 1.18.1 until 1.19.4 [1.18.1~ 1.19.x] Forge is not compatible with Openj9 17 Mar 21, 2023
@ChampionAsh5357
Copy link
Contributor

The error is self-explanatory. Forge does not and will not support the OpenJ9 JVM.

@ChampionAsh5357 ChampionAsh5357 closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 21, 2023
@ChampionAsh5357 ChampionAsh5357 added Wont Fix/Works As Intended This request reports something that would break expectations in order to fix. and removed Triage This request requires the active attention of the Triage Team. Requires labelling or reviews. labels Mar 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Wont Fix/Works As Intended This request reports something that would break expectations in order to fix.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants