Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ResultProperties: Added keywords for CCSD quantities. #54

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 25, 2019

Conversation

sjrl
Copy link
Contributor

@sjrl sjrl commented Apr 11, 2019

Added keywords for CCSD quantities. Is this all that needs to be done? Or does the qc_schema also need to be updated?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 11, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #54 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@dgasmith
Copy link
Collaborator

I think this should a PR to QCSchema first. A few of those quantities will need string explanations with them and there will be some feedback there I am guessing.

@sjrl
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjrl commented Apr 12, 2019

I have made a PR to QCSchema for the CCSD quantities (MolSSI/QCSchema#61).

@dgasmith
Copy link
Collaborator

This should be good to update.

@sjrl
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjrl commented Apr 23, 2019

So I have added the CC keywords to QCElemental. Should I also go ahead with the renaming of mp2_total_correlation_energy to mp2_correlation_energy?

@loriab
Copy link
Collaborator

loriab commented Apr 23, 2019

Should I also go ahead with the renaming of mp2_total_correlation_energy to mp2_correlation_energy?

yes, please. any and all changes to make qcel agree with the qcschema PR.

@sjrl
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjrl commented Apr 23, 2019

Okay I've updated the mp2 to match the QCSchema PR. Presumably this will cause some problems in other parts of the QCArchive.

ccsdt_correlation_energy: float = None
ccsdt_total_energy: float = None
ccsdt_dipole_moment: List[float] = None
ccsdt_iterations: int = None
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CCSDT(Q) last one (ugh).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this for completions sake? Since it looks like there a number of other CC methods out there too.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, honestly scratching my head on this one a bit after seeing it in practice. Anything beyond CCSD(T) might be better served in qcvars. @loriab?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just checked and CCSDT(Q) wasn't added to qcschema. I think it's ok to skip for now.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah it doesn't seem there are a lot of codes out there that support past CCSD(T). I guess if we are still on this topic I'd only advocate for the addition of CC-F12 methods.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in my experience, these are what you want to collect for f12 methods from molpro. not sure what balance of work-with-this-and-learn-from-practice or add-em-now to suggest.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh, and one shouldn't actually be storing (T), (T*), (T**), as those can be built by equation

Copy link
Collaborator

@loriab loriab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. I think CCF12 and/or (Q) can go in another round. Current can be a start for the next qcel release. If you make any other changes, please go ahead and add a line for the next release https://github.com/MolSSI/QCElemental/blob/master/docs/source/changelog.rst .

@sjrl
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjrl commented Apr 24, 2019

I'm happy to leave as is and add in more in later rounds. So to clarify do I need to add a line for the current PR to https://github.com/MolSSI/QCElemental/blob/master/docs/source/changelog.rst ?

@dgasmith
Copy link
Collaborator

Lets leave it as is, but snip off everything after CCSD(T). The changeling line would be great!

@sjrl
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjrl commented Apr 24, 2019

Okay so snip out stuff after CCSD(T) here in results.py but leave those quantities in QCSchema? And great I'll add a line.

@dgasmith dgasmith merged commit f3ab235 into MolSSI:master Apr 25, 2019
@sjrl sjrl deleted the ccsd branch April 25, 2019 17:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants