You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Of these, 8 do not have a species associated with the tag.
Given the automation with #103 and data cleanup with #129 and #130, recommend these records be updated as well.
To Fix
A script could be run to update the Habit field based on tlu_Plants (after it is updated to refect changes from #129, #130) -OR-
These could be updated over time using the application and a printout of those needing updates.
Do we need to document these changes like other tag history values?
Per our discussion the following records will not have a Habit due to the records not being sampled:
Dead (not sampled because dead)
RFS (removed from study)
Records in this state will need to have their species set to 'Unknown' with the Habit set to 'Tree' based on the default for the 'Unknown' tlu_Plants species record.
Investigating sapling data further, there currently are 1399 records from regular events (not PseudoEvents) where no Habit data was entered.
20190522_SaplingData_Missing_Habit.xlsx
Of these, 8 do not have a species associated with the tag.
Given the automation with #103 and data cleanup with #129 and #130, recommend these records be updated as well.
To Fix
A script could be run to update the Habit field based on tlu_Plants (after it is updated to refect changes from #129, #130)
-OR-
These could be updated over time using the application and a printout of those needing updates.
Do we need to document these changes like other tag history values?
@lizmatthews03 , @johnpauls, @abrolis please weigh in on the preferred fix & whether a history is desired.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: