<Limb>: Type vs LimbType

[Dragorn421]

in the oot repo both <Limb Type="..."> and <Limb LimbType="..."> are used

$ grep -r assets/xml/ -e 'Limb.*\bLimbType' | wc --lines
2169
$ grep -r assets/xml/ -e 'Limb.*\bType' | wc --lines
427

From https://github.com/zeldaret/ZAPD/blob/master/docs/zapd_extraction_xml_reference.md#limb I assume the correct one is LimbType

ZAPD should at least warn about a missing "LimbType" because I assume all those <Limb>s setting Type just have the Type value ignored

I assume LimbType defaults to Standard, everything setting Type uses Standard except object_link_child.xml which has some Type="LOD"

EDIT: I don't even think ZAPD knows what it's doing
https://github.com/zeldaret/ZAPD/blob/82bd27604a4c8f8c1f01f9c2f54c87fab103c39f/ZAPD/ZLimb.cpp#L381-L384
Does this mean Type and LimbType are "aliases", is that intended

[AngheloAlf]

Yes, Type and LimbType are alliases between them.
We could deprecate Type if people feel like we should do it.