Add support for setting send and receive buffer sizes #12
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
k0ekk0ek
commented
Jun 4, 2019
Signed-off-by: Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen@nlnetlabs.nl>
Signed-off-by: Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen@nlnetlabs.nl>
k0ekk0ek
force-pushed
the
sock-buffer-sizes
branch
from
5d1c13a
to
042d5ab
Compare
wcawijngaards
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2019
reject-overflow options for nsd.conf, from Jeroen Koekkoek.
|
Thanks for the PR, it has been merged in a previous commit. |
k0ekk0ek
pushed a commit
to k0ekk0ek/nsd
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2019
Add support for setting send and receive buffer sizes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request adds support for overriding the default socket send and receive buffer sizes, which is useful in case the default buffer sizes (1m to avoid messages being lost in spikes (I think)) are either too small or too large.
For convenience I've pushed the implementation for forcefully rejecting connections to this branch too, hope that's ok.