Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Title for the NMRlipids IVb article #39

Closed
ohsOllila opened this issue Jan 12, 2021 · 9 comments
Closed

Title for the NMRlipids IVb article #39

ohsOllila opened this issue Jan 12, 2021 · 9 comments

Comments

@ohsOllila
Copy link
Member

We need to figure out a good title for the article. Current title is only the working title. Suggestions are welcomed here.

@markussmiettinen
Copy link
Member

Protein–lipid interactions are not regulated by conformational restrictions of the phosphatidylcholine, -ethanolamine, -serine, and -glycerol headgroups

@ohsOllila ohsOllila changed the title Title for the article Title for the NMRlipids IVb article Jan 22, 2021
@ivan-gushchin-mipt
Copy link
Contributor

I haven't participated in the earlier discussions, so my suggestion may be off. Overall, the work is similar to the previous one, so why not "Headgroup structure and cation binding in phosphoethanolamine and phosphoglycerol lipid bilayers in simulations and experiments: critical comparison"? Some words can be omitted, for example if the comparison is not critical. Or, the words can be shuffled. I guess there is not much that can be added or removed from the title.

Other similar ideas:

  • Headgroup structure and cation binding in phosphoethanolamine and phosphoglycerol lipid bilayers in simulations and experiments: comparison with other lipid types - too long?
  • Phospholipid headgroup structure and cation binding in simulations and experiments: critical comparison
  • Headgroup structure and cation binding in PC, PE, PG and PS lipid bilayers in simulations and experiments: critical comparison - usually, the editors are not happy with abbreviations in the titles

@ivan-gushchin-mipt
Copy link
Contributor

I really should've read the manuscript before suggesting the title. Having done that, I may also suggest:

  • Conformational plasticity of phospholipid headgroups in simulations and experiment(s)
  • Flexibility of phospholipid headgroups in simulations and experiment(s)
  • Phospholipid headgroups in simulations and experiments: conformational plasticity and cation binding

@ohsOllila
Copy link
Member Author

I like this one: "Conformational plasticity of phospholipid headgroups in simulations and experiments"

@markussmiettinen
Copy link
Member

I like the concept conformational plasticity! But I think simulations and experiments does not add much to the title. Thus I propose:

  • Conformational plasticity of phospholipid headgroups
    (Simpler, shorter, more general.)
  • Conformational plasticity of phospholipid headgroups revealed by combining molecular dynamics simulations and solid-state NMR experiments
    (Highlights our unique method.)

@tfmFerreira
Copy link

I agree with Markus that "simulations and experiments" is a bit too vague. I would suggest "Conformational plasticity of lipid headgroups in cellular membranes and protein-lipid complexes" but I also like the second option from Markus "Conformational plasticity of phospholipid headgroups revealed by combining molecular dynamics simulations and solid-state NMR experiments"

@ohsOllila
Copy link
Member Author

ohsOllila commented May 5, 2021

This is my favorite: "Conformational plasticity of lipid headgroups in cellular membranes and protein-lipid complexes"

@ivan-gushchin-mipt
Copy link
Contributor

I agree with Markus and everybody, it is better to add details. All proposed variants look great to me.

@ohsOllila
Copy link
Member Author

After comments from the editors, the title of the manuscript is now "Inverse conformational selection in lipid-protein binding". I will close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants