You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
./build_all.sh builds the ufs-weather-model with waves configured with a structured grid. This is a requirement for GFSv17.
To build the ufs-weather-model with with configured with unstructured grid, an argument -w needs to be passed to build_all.sh.
This is often overlooked by developers and results in the model hanging for GFS configurations.
This feature requests flipping the -w switch where -w would build the ufs-weather-model with a structured grid.
What are the requirements for the new functionality?
No additional requirements than what is already there.
Acceptance Criteria
Updated documentation
Passing tests for GFS and GEFS
Suggest a solution (optional)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This PR:
- builds the unstructured waves as default when invoked with
`build_all.sh`.
- updates the CI testing infrastructure to handle this change.
- updates the documentation to reflect this change in behaviour.
To build with structured grid for waves, the flag `-w` needs to be
passed to `./build_all.sh`. Previously, this would trigger the
unstructured grid. Since GFSv17 will move to unstructured grid as
default for waves, this makes it easier for a majority of developers.
Resolves#2461
What new functionality do you need?
./build_all.sh
builds the ufs-weather-model with waves configured with a structured grid. This is a requirement for GFSv17.To build the ufs-weather-model with with configured with unstructured grid, an argument
-w
needs to be passed tobuild_all.sh
.This is often overlooked by developers and results in the model hanging for GFS configurations.
This feature requests flipping the
-w
switch where-w
would build the ufs-weather-model with a structured grid.What are the requirements for the new functionality?
No additional requirements than what is already there.
Acceptance Criteria
Suggest a solution (optional)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: