Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chillers and WaterToWater Heat pumps will accept only a CondenserLoop on the Condenser or Source Side #4972

Closed
KWSL opened this issue Jun 15, 2015 · 12 comments
Assignees
Labels
PriorityLow This defect or feature has been declared low priority SeverityHigh This defect is high severity, generally indicating a hard crash without a workaround

Comments

@KWSL
Copy link
Contributor

KWSL commented Jun 15, 2015

Chillers and WaterToWater Heat pumps will not operate if the condenser side is connected to a PlantLoop. This eliminates the possibility of connecting the condenser side directly to a loop where heat recovery is desired. Take the example of a building with a boiler and cooling tower both connected to a PlantLoop for use in a heat pump loop. This building cannot also be modeled with a water to water heat pump connected to the same loop.

The curious thing is that the model will run with watertowater heat pumps and chillers connected to PlantLoops, but no heating or cooling is produced.

@KWSL
Copy link
Contributor Author

KWSL commented Jun 16, 2015

Another way to solve this would be to allow all the same plant equipment to provide the supply side of a Condenser Loop. We would also need the setpointmanagers to work the same way as on a PlantLoop.

@mjwitte
Copy link
Contributor

mjwitte commented Jun 16, 2015

@KWSL There must be something else going on here. I have connected the condenser side of a chiller to a PlantLoop, and the WaterToWater Heat Pumps also. Please e-mail examples to me directly. Thanks.

@KWSL
Copy link
Contributor Author

KWSL commented Jun 16, 2015

emailed. Montpelier, VT TMY3 weather file and simulated using version 8.3.3

@mjwitte mjwitte added EnergyPlus SeverityMedium This defect is medium severity, indicating moderate impact and generally no workaround available labels Jun 19, 2015
@mjwitte
Copy link
Contributor

mjwitte commented Jun 19, 2015

Same issue as #4385 but different defect files.

@mjwitte mjwitte added SeverityHigh This defect is high severity, generally indicating a hard crash without a workaround PriorityLow This defect or feature has been declared low priority and removed SeverityMedium This defect is medium severity, indicating moderate impact and generally no workaround available labels Jun 19, 2015
@mjwitte
Copy link
Contributor

mjwitte commented Jun 19, 2015

And helpdesk ticket 10532

@KWSL
Copy link
Contributor Author

KWSL commented Jun 30, 2015

I'd be happy to try to figure out what this is, if someone can give me some suggestions on where to begin looking. From my test files, when one of these components is attached to a PlantLoop, the simulation runs fine, but there is never any source side flow. Even if I hard-size the flow-rate at the branch level, I don't get any flow. This leads me to believe that the issue is with normal run-time and not with sizing. Any ideas on subroutines to start looking in?

@mjwitte
Copy link
Contributor

mjwitte commented Jun 30, 2015

@Myoldmopar Any suggestions for @KWSL for where to look for flow controls that would behave differently for a component when it's on a plant loop vs condenser loop?

@Myoldmopar
Copy link
Member

That's a pretty interesting issue. There are very very few places in the source that still consider a difference between plant and condenser loops. I'll take this issue and see what I can come up with.

@Myoldmopar Myoldmopar self-assigned this Jun 30, 2015
@KWSL
Copy link
Contributor Author

KWSL commented Jun 30, 2015

I know. I started looking yesterday, and found very few differences, only in setting up allowable SetpointManagers and Plant Loop Demand Calculation Scheme.

Thanks for taking this on @Myoldmopar. I contributed a minor update to the WatertoAirHeatPump model a few years ago, so I have some familiarity with the code, but it's a lot to search for a bug like this without having a deeper understanding of the program!

@mjwitte
Copy link
Contributor

mjwitte commented Sep 15, 2015

@KWSL The GLHE problem has been fixed in #5184. We can't reproduce a problem for the chiller. 4972_ChillerCondOnCondenserLoop and 4972_ChillerCondOnPlantLoop produce the same results. If you have another file that does show a problem for chillers with the condenser on a plant loop, please send it to me.

@mjwitte mjwitte removed this from the EnergyPlus 8.4.0 milestone Sep 15, 2015
@KWSL
Copy link
Contributor Author

KWSL commented Sep 30, 2015

sweet! I don't have a specific test file for the chillers.

Thanks,

Karen

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Michael J. Witte notifications@github.com
wrote:

@KWSL https://github.com/KWSL The GLHE problem has been fixed in #5184
#5184. We can't reproduce a
problem for the chiller. 4972_ChillerCondOnCondenserLoop and
4972_ChillerCondOnPlantLoop produce the same results. If you have another
file that does show a problem for chillers with the condenser on a plant
loop, please send it to me.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4972 (comment).

@mjwitte
Copy link
Contributor

mjwitte commented Dec 5, 2015

Cannot reproduce, closing.

@mjwitte mjwitte closed this as completed Dec 5, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
PriorityLow This defect or feature has been declared low priority SeverityHigh This defect is high severity, generally indicating a hard crash without a workaround
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants