Resolution of function names in profiler timeline. #6
Conversation
…is compiled with this flag, the function names are displayed in the profiler time-lines.
|
|
||
| compiler_inst_nvtx: compiler_inst_nvtx.cu Makefile inst_nvtx.o | ||
| nvcc -Xcompiler -fPIC -Xcompiler -finstrument-functions -arch=sm_20 inst_nvtx.o -ldl -lnvToolsExt -o compiler_inst_nvtx compiler_inst_nvtx.cu | ||
| compiler_inst_nvtx: compiler_inst_nvtx1.cu Makefile inst_nvtx.o |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why compiler_inst_nvtx1.cu and not compiler_inst_nvtx.cu? compiler_inst_nvtx1.cu is not in the repository so that should be compiler_inst_nvtx.cu.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That is correct. compiler_inst_nvtx1.cu was experimental file I made. Should I create another pull request?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can modify this one, I believe. Either way, please make it right before
I accept.
Thanks,
Mark
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:58 PM Vinay Deshpande notifications@github.com
wrote:
In posts/nvtx/Makefile
#6 (comment)
:-compiler_inst_nvtx: compiler_inst_nvtx.cu Makefile inst_nvtx.o
- nvcc -Xcompiler -fPIC -Xcompiler -finstrument-functions -arch=sm_20 inst_nvtx.o -ldl -lnvToolsExt -o compiler_inst_nvtx compiler_inst_nvtx.cu
+compiler_inst_nvtx: compiler_inst_nvtx1.cu Makefile inst_nvtx.oThat is correct. compiler_inst_nvtx1.cu was experimental file I made.
Should I create another pull request?—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/parallel-forall/code-samples/pull/6/files#r53441701.
Resolution of function names in profiler timeline.
Changed Makefile to compile the host code with -export-dynamic flag. This is necessary for the resolution of function names in compiler instrumented entry and exit functions.