Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate L1 FW iterators tests. Clear previous data in iterators loop #779

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 16, 2019

Conversation

jantonguirao
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Joaquin Anton janton@nvidia.com

Signed-off-by: Joaquin Anton <janton@nvidia.com>
@jantonguirao
Copy link
Contributor Author

!build

Copy link
Contributor

@klecki klecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI MESSAGE: [705149]: BUILD STARTED

Signed-off-by: Joaquin Anton <janton@nvidia.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@klecki klecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI MESSAGE: [705182]: BUILD STARTED

@jantonguirao jantonguirao changed the title Separate L2 FW iterators tests Separate L2 FW iterators tests. Clear previous data in iterators loop Apr 15, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@klecki klecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI MESSAGE: [705197]: BUILD STARTED

Signed-off-by: Joaquin Anton <janton@nvidia.com>
@jantonguirao jantonguirao changed the title Separate L2 FW iterators tests. Clear previous data in iterators loop Separate L1 FW iterators tests. Clear previous data in iterators loop Apr 15, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@klecki klecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI MESSAGE: [705300]: BUILD STARTED

@JanuszL
Copy link
Contributor

JanuszL commented Apr 15, 2019

Test takes more than 60 minutes. Are we sure we need to test it that extensively?

Copy link
Contributor

@klecki klecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI MESSAGE: [705300]: BUILD PASSED

qa/L0_FW_iterators/test.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Joaquin Anton <janton@nvidia.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@klecki klecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI MESSAGE: [706190]: BUILD STARTED

Copy link
Contributor

@klecki klecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI MESSAGE: [706190]: BUILD PASSED

Signed-off-by: Joaquin Anton <janton@nvidia.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@klecki klecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI MESSAGE: [706280]: BUILD STARTED

Copy link
Contributor

@klecki klecki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI MESSAGE: [706280]: BUILD PASSED

@jantonguirao jantonguirao merged commit f392e8e into NVIDIA:master Apr 16, 2019
JanuszL pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2019
… loop (#779)

Signed-off-by: Joaquin Anton <janton@nvidia.com>
kychennv pushed a commit to kychennv/DALI that referenced this pull request May 14, 2019
… loop (NVIDIA#779)

Signed-off-by: Joaquin Anton <janton@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: kychennv <kychen@nvidia.com>
haoxintong pushed a commit to haoxintong/DALI that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2019
… loop (NVIDIA#779)

Signed-off-by: Joaquin Anton <janton@nvidia.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants