You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll have more coming as soon as the current PR is accepted.
I've split the protocol server classes into logical units, and I'll start a new PR with the more breaking changes once that is accepted. Also notice how I've split the original 3.0.0 issue into 4 tasks since that is way too big to count only as one ( see #278 )
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LordFokas looks very good to me ;-) and you are in control you can merge the PR whenever you want. (But Repair the tests before..)
proposal: when you are making a breaking change, maybe also rename the packages to org.nanohttpd.abc.def...??
3d31497
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had that one on my PR :|
3d31497
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry, was waiting so long to add you. ;-)) I had to do it the first second I knew what to write.... Great that you started the 3.0 work!
3d31497
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll have more coming as soon as the current PR is accepted.
I've split the protocol server classes into logical units, and I'll start a new PR with the more breaking changes once that is accepted. Also notice how I've split the original 3.0.0 issue into 4 tasks since that is way too big to count only as one ( see #278 )
3d31497
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LordFokas looks very good to me ;-) and you are in control you can merge the PR whenever you want. (But Repair the tests before..)
proposal: when you are making a breaking change, maybe also rename the packages to org.nanohttpd.abc.def...??
3d31497
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But I did that. To every package. And restructured the protocol packages to org.nanohttpd.protocols.
I have no idea what's wrong with the tests, they're just like they were when I pulled master into my machine, I didn't mess with the test code (yet).
And I know I'm in control, but I feel 3.0 is too big for me to push it all into master by myself without feedback.