Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Harvest should collect and display Flexgroup Informations #2142

Closed
Sandromuc opened this issue Jun 20, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2410
Closed

Harvest should collect and display Flexgroup Informations #2142

Sandromuc opened this issue Jun 20, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2410
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Sandromuc
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Flexgroups are already shown in Volume Dashboard

Describe the solution you'd like
Information about constituent volumes and aggregate list are missing.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternatively a new Dashboard only for Flexgroups

@Sandromuc Sandromuc added the feature New feature or request label Jun 20, 2023
@Hardikl Hardikl self-assigned this Sep 29, 2023
@ewilts
Copy link

ewilts commented Oct 3, 2023

To add to the original comments:
The newly added (thanks!) "Top Volume FabricPool" is ignoring all of the FlexGroup constituents. When aggregates get full, we also consider the FG constituents when deciding what volumes to move around so it's important that they get included too. On the first aggregate I checked, 3 of the top 5 volumes by performance tier utilization are FG constituents yet were not listed on the dashboard. And now that I look around some more, there appears to be almost no support for FlexGroup constituents in the Volume dashboard at all.

I can see that implementing support for flexgroups is non-trivial - there are times I just want the overall FG data but other times I want it broken down by constituent like I described above, even for the same graph (latency, throughput, IOPS, etc.)

@rahulguptajss
Copy link
Contributor

verified in main

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants