Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[2.3] Don't seteuid() if process is already running as that uid. #532

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

[2.3] Don't seteuid() if process is already running as that uid. #532

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

rdmark
Copy link
Member

@rdmark rdmark commented Oct 15, 2023 •
edited
Loading

A straggler patch from 2.x / netatalk-classic.

@rdmark rdmark changed the base branch from branch-netatalk-2-2 to branch-netatalk-2-3 October 15, 2023 13:14
@rdmark rdmark changed the title Don't seteuid() if process is already running as that uid. [2.2] Don't seteuid() if process is already running as that uid. Oct 15, 2023
@rdmark rdmark changed the title [2.2] Don't seteuid() if process is already running as that uid. [2.3] Don't seteuid() if process is already running as that uid. Oct 16, 2023
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 16, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

warning The version of Java (11.0.17) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17.
Read more here

@rdmark rdmark marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2023 13:20
@rdmark rdmark requested a review from dgsga October 16, 2023 13:20
@rdmark rdmark merged commit ea57c19 into branch-netatalk-2-3 Oct 16, 2023
5 checks passed
@rdmark rdmark deleted the rdmark-seteuid-fix branch October 16, 2023 21:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dgsga dgsga dgsga approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@rdmark @dgsga