Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove requirement for provideThis() #29

Closed
codefromthecrypt opened this issue Mar 2, 2013 · 0 comments
Closed

remove requirement for provideThis() #29

codefromthecrypt opened this issue Mar 2, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

per square/dagger#176 we can unwind some complexity that results in implementors having to add provideThis() to their Provider subclasses in the following fashion:

One thing you could experiment with is ObjectGraph.plus(). Perhaps you could build your application in two phases: build a small inner object graph with everything you need during bootstrap, then build upon that to create a more complete object graph.
codefromthecrypt pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2013
…g in Dagger 1.0 modules cannot extend abstract classes
codefromthecrypt pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2013
…g in Dagger 1.0 modules cannot extend abstract classes
codefromthecrypt pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2013
…g in Dagger 1.0 modules cannot extend abstract classes
codefromthecrypt pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 24, 2013
fix issue #29: undo circular dependency between denominator.Provider and its dagger.Module
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant