Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

" Invalid - block" reported for all blocks starting around 1500 EST on Jan 21 #6588

Closed
wga22 opened this issue Jan 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Comments

@wga22
Copy link

wga22 commented Jan 21, 2024

Description
Execution client stopped being able to process blocks (perhaps across all Nethermind client users)

Steps to Reproduce
Run nethermind versions 1.25, 1.25.1 or 1.26

Actual behavior

last valid is 0x932123bf49f6ffce68aac29820bda6028d3bf7aebbebd5fdc758dac9d1c81c46
Jan 21 15:51:11 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:11 | Received ForkChoice: Head: 19056963 (0xe7bc99...78e25f), Safe: 19056884 (0xcf8b3e...5255a7),
Finalized: 19056852 (0xeb564e...dce829)
Jan 21 15:51:12 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:12 | Received new block: 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489)
Jan 21 15:51:12 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:12 | Invalid - block 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489) is known to be a part of an invalid chain. The
last valid is 0x932123bf49f6ffce68aac29820bda6028d3bf7aebbebd5fdc758dac9d1c81c46
Jan 21 15:51:15 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:15 | Received new block: 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489)
Jan 21 15:51:15 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:15 | Invalid - block 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489) is known to be a part of an invalid chain. The
last valid is 0x932123bf49f6ffce68aac29820bda6028d3bf7aebbebd5fdc758dac9d1c81c46
Jan 21 15:51:22 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:22 | Received new block: 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489)
Jan 21 15:51:22 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:22 | Invalid - block 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489) is known to be a part of an invalid chain. The
last valid is 0x932123bf49f6ffce68aac29820bda6028d3bf7aebbebd5fdc758dac9d1c81c46
Jan 21 15:51:26 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:26 | Received new block: 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489)
Jan 21 15:51:26 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:26 | Invalid - block 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489) is known to be a part of an invalid chain. The
last valid is 0x932123bf49f6ffce68aac29820bda6028d3bf7aebbebd5fdc758dac9d1c81c46
Jan 21 15:51:30 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:30 | Received new block: 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489)
Jan 21 15:51:30 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:30 | Invalid - block 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489) is known to be a part of an invalid chain. The
last valid is 0x932123bf49f6ffce68aac29820bda6028d3bf7aebbebd5fdc758dac9d1c81c46
Jan 21 15:51:41 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:41 | Received new block: 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489)
Jan 21 15:51:41 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:41 | Invalid - block 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489) is known to be a part of an invalid chain. The
last valid is 0x932123bf49f6ffce68aac29820bda6028d3bf7aebbebd5fdc758dac9d1c81c46
Jan 21 15:51:43 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:43 | Removing 1059 out of 11059 peer candidates (candidates cleanup).
Jan 21 15:51:47 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:47 | Received ForkChoice: Head: 19056963 (0xe7bc99...78e25f), Safe: 19056884 (0xcf8b3e...5255a7),
Finalized: 19056852 (0xeb564e...dce829)
Jan 21 15:51:55 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:55 | Received new block: 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489)
Jan 21 15:51:55 mobius.lan nethermind[8828]: 21 Jan 15:51:55 | Invalid - block 19056922 (0x76eca7...81d489) is known to be a part of an invalid chain. The
last valid is 0x932123bf49f6ffce68aac29820bda6028d3bf7aebbebd5fdc758dac9d1c81c46

Expected behavior
process blocks

@tianshiz
Copy link

can confirm, was on 1.25.1, went back to 1.25, same issue

@MarekM25
Copy link
Contributor

@wga22 @tianshiz update your nodes to 1.25.2
https://github.com/NethermindEth/nethermind/releases/tag/1.25.2

@snoopmx
Copy link

snoopmx commented Jan 21, 2024

Resync database now

@MarekM25
Copy link
Contributor

No resync required :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants