Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional columns that should be evaluated #127

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 1, 2021

Conversation

jsosulski
Copy link
Collaborator

For instance when comparing different covariance matrix estimation techniques I maybe want to know the determinant/condition/something of each method in order to maybe explain a difference in the outcome, i.e. score.

So far this PR only allows the user to define additional columns that should be evaluated. To actually fill these with values, a custom Evaluation implementation is needed.

@jsosulski
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is a working implementation of adding additional columns to the results object. @sylvchev if we could merge this, I can push changes to #132 so that the information how large the data subset is, is no longer stored in the session string. Alternatively we can first look at this PR next week before going over #132.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow evaluation of additional scores/parameters/metrics
2 participants