Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update urllib3 to 1.23 #56

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pyup-bot pyup-bot commented Oct 9, 2018

This PR updates urllib3 from 1.22 to 1.23.

Changelog

1.23

-----------------

* Allow providing a list of headers to strip from requests when redirecting
to a different host. Defaults to the ``Authorization`` header. Different
headers can be set via ``Retry.remove_headers_on_redirect``. (Issue 1316)

* Fix ``util.selectors._fileobj_to_fd`` to accept ``long`` (Issue 1247).

* Dropped Python 3.3 support. (Pull 1242)

* Put the connection back in the pool when calling stream() or read_chunked() on
a chunked HEAD response. (Issue 1234)

* Fixed pyOpenSSL-specific ssl client authentication issue when clients
attempted to auth via certificate + chain (Issue 1060)

* Add the port to the connectionpool connect print (Pull 1251)

* Don't use the ``uuid`` module to create multipart data boundaries. (Pull 1380)

* ``read_chunked()`` on a closed response returns no chunks. (Issue 1088)

* Add Python 2.6 support to ``contrib.securetransport`` (Pull 1359)

* Added support for auth info in url for SOCKS proxy (Pull 1363)
Links

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 21

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 48.615%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 18: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 351
Relevant Lines: 722

💛 - Coveralls

@NicolasLM NicolasLM closed this Oct 9, 2018
@NicolasLM NicolasLM deleted the pyup-update-urllib3-1.22-to-1.23 branch October 11, 2018 20:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants