Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Define the role and organization of the foundation #32
Define the role and organization of the foundation #32
Changes from 4 commits
0f06884
1ec3a38
69988a3
cc01a50
b2a6491
de0be10
ba75a95
4b6d915
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't exactly match the rest of the mission statement. The foundation cannot provide human resources, but support and arrange for people to get together. Conflict moderation is the moderation team's job, and you already covered the escalation capacity (which would be part of the board's job) at the bottom.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, I think we mean more about an escalation route if all other recommended/defined channels fails
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but it can (and I believe should) give the moderation team legitimity to do so. Would
be better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the marketing team's job.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Of course, but everything here is some team's job. But that doesn't mean that it's can't ultimately be the Foundation's responsibility (the same way that running the infrastructure is the infra team's job, but the Foundation is accountable for it).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe put it a bit more generally: gather data to take the pulse of the community and communicate the results.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We'll keep having conversations and updating the document. This doesn't need to be set in stone.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like it if it was a bit more explicit that the board doesn't provide technical leadership, so that members can turn to the right people when looking to participate in the ecosystem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would even expand that to make it clear that -> The board is not responsible for technical leadership, decisions or direction
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed. I've made that more explicit in ad5a6a779084159eb27d83fb6482357e434af667
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added in ba75a95
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's missing here is handing out permissions and credentials. Someone has to hold and manage the keys.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added in 4b6d915 (although I'm not entirely sure I've put it in the best possible place)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ideally, the Foundation members do not hold any critical security tokens, but have a good working relationship with and can delegate those tasks to the Infra team. Otherwise, it will be difficult for the infra team to guarantee the security of the infrastructure as a whole.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zimbatm I would argue that the infra team needs in practice to have access to most systems, but it shouldn't have the responsibility of delegating the access to other teams. Maybe that shouldn't be the foundation board either though, but then we don't have anybody in a good position for it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The board would still hold the power to instruct the infra team to delegate access, either directly, or by delegating some of that access further down to the community. For example by setting up an election system.
But this is more of a future statement. The current infra team needs more people and a better interface.