Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
gcc7: init at 7.1.0
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@abbradar
abbradar committed Jun 3, 2017
1 parent 6265306 commit 0dc5473
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 566 additions and 0 deletions.
Loading

6 comments on commit 0dc5473

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0dc5473 Nov 11, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@abbradar: at this commit you differ at a few lines from gcc-6. Do you remember reasons for those differences?

In particular, flex addition seems unnecessary and would break bootstrapping currently if using gcc-7 by default (due to fetchpatch in flex). You also removed the use-source-date-epoch.patch. Could these be unintentional differences, perhaps caused by rebasing/cherry-picking?

@abbradar
Copy link
Member Author

@abbradar abbradar commented on 0dc5473 Nov 11, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like it (rebasing shenanigans): diff also shows this comment:

# Ensure that -print-prog-name is able to find the correct programs.

and I don't know what is this all about at all. Let's then synchronize with GCC 6.

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0dc5473 Nov 11, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, we might stop copying version-controlled files...

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0dc5473 Nov 11, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, gcc-7 has sensitivity to $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH built in, so the patch is useless now (and doesn't apply).

@abbradar
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I look now at possibility of unifying our GCC packages -- maybe this would be simpler than I thought...

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0dc5473 Nov 11, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The syncing commit: 3610d63

Please sign in to comment.