Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

linux-pam: 1.3.1 or reason to stay with 1.3.0? #55617

Closed
dtzWill opened this issue Feb 12, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

linux-pam: 1.3.1 or reason to stay with 1.3.0? #55617

dtzWill opened this issue Feb 12, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@dtzWill
Copy link
Member

dtzWill commented Feb 12, 2019

Issue description

pam 1.3.1 released a while back (~11 months ago), see: https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/releases/tag/v1.3.1

repology suggests it's generally adopted elsewhere: https://repology.org/metapackage/pam/information

For something fundamental like PAM it seems we'd want to not mess around with older versions unless there was a reason-- although a quick review of the changes doesn't reveal a pressing need to upgrade either, so.... maybe we just don't want to break all the things? :)

Anyway wanted to ask to make sure it wasn't lost in flurry of PR's or something-- is there a reason to not move to 1.3.1?

The musl patch stack will need adjusting of course but otherwise....? :)

@matthiasbeyer matthiasbeyer mentioned this issue Apr 9, 2019
10 tasks
@dtzWill dtzWill closed this as completed Nov 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant