We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v3.5.1
No response
v20.10.0
MongoDB
Look into Google Search console or use their rich data tool to directly check a topic, e.g. https://search.google.com/test/rich-results/result/r%2Fdiscussion-forum?id=HeHDbDMe_4T8uXKPIZWRgg
For google to correctly parse the structured data
Google throws multiple errors. Primary issues:
name
datePublished
author
text
image
video
There's also a warning for missing url property, and the tool mentiones that optionally comments could be listed in CreativeWork objects.
url
CreativeWork
Even if Google is in the wrong about specs, NodeBB should probably follow Google here...
Related to this forum thread
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
oplik0
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
NodeBB version
v3.5.1
NodeBB git hash
No response
NodeJS version
v20.10.0
Installed NodeBB plugins
No response
Database type
MongoDB
Database version
No response
Exact steps to cause this issue
Look into Google Search console or use their rich data tool to directly check a topic, e.g. https://search.google.com/test/rich-results/result/r%2Fdiscussion-forum?id=HeHDbDMe_4T8uXKPIZWRgg
What you expected
For google to correctly parse the structured data
What happened instead
Google throws multiple errors. Primary issues:
name
field (should be Text. I think according to spec the URL should be serialized, but I guess Google didn't bother)datePublished
andauthor
fieldstext
/image
/video
specifiedThere's also a warning for missing
url
property, and the tool mentiones that optionally comments could be listed inCreativeWork
objects.Anything else?
Even if Google is in the wrong about specs, NodeBB should probably follow Google here...
Related to this forum thread
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: