Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 8, 2023. It is now read-only.

Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.42.0 #227

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 31, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 5.41.0 -> 5.42.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser 5.41.0 -> 5.42.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v5.42.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • ast-spec: add TSQualifiedName to TypeNode union (#​5906) (5c316c1)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-extra-parens] handle type assertion in extends clause (#​5901) (8ed7219)
Features
  • eslint-plugin: [member-ordering] add natural sort order (#​5662) (1eaae09)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-invalid-void-type] better report message for void used as a constituent inside a function return type (#​5274) (d806bda)
typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v5.42.0

Compare Source

Features
Reverts

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested review from auguwu and IceeMC as code owners October 31, 2022 19:13
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 36da14b into master Oct 31, 2022
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch October 31, 2022 22:51
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants