Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #7702: Create files to hold release informations #112

Conversation

peckpeck
Copy link
Member

@peckpeck
Copy link
Member Author

Do not merge, this is a PR to discuss the file format and structure.

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
# Release data file

# Supported architecture for each distribution
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Format:

  • comments allowed
  • key=value allowed without "" around key
  • { "key": "value" } allowed

@jooooooon
Copy link
Member

I like the file format overall. It's natural and easy to read.

@peckpeck
Copy link
Member Author

PR updated

@peckpeck peckpeck force-pushed the ust_7702/create_files_to_hold_release_informations branch from 9c13140 to 4fe4c57 Compare December 30, 2015 10:19
# Release data file

# Supported architecture for each distribution
ARCHITECTURE = { "debian-5": [ "i386", "amd64" ],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I think this key name is not great - this is a list of OS -> arches paris, not really just architectures.

How about os_architectures or something similar ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, after discussion, architecture is fine. But we should use architectures like roles and packages.

@peckpeck
Copy link
Member Author

PR updated

@peckpeck peckpeck force-pushed the ust_7702/create_files_to_hold_release_informations branch from 4fe4c57 to 79bc424 Compare December 30, 2015 14:58
@peckpeck
Copy link
Member Author

PR updated

@peckpeck peckpeck force-pushed the ust_7702/create_files_to_hold_release_informations branch from 79bc424 to a6b28fe Compare December 30, 2015 15:09
freebsd = {
aliases = [ ]
package-format = ""
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about solaris ?

@peckpeck
Copy link
Member Author

PR updated

@peckpeck peckpeck force-pushed the ust_7702/create_files_to_hold_release_informations branch from a6b28fe to 2561868 Compare December 30, 2015 16:38
@peckpeck
Copy link
Member Author

PR updated

@peckpeck peckpeck force-pushed the ust_7702/create_files_to_hold_release_informations branch from 2561868 to 74410c5 Compare December 30, 2015 16:44
"agent-allinone": [ "rudder-agent" ],
"agent-thin": [ "rudder-agent-thin" ],
"relay": [ "rudder-server-relay" ],
"server": [ "rudder-inventory-endpoint", "rudder-jetty", "rudder-reports", "rudder-server-root", "rudder-webapp", "rudder-techniques", "ncf", "ncf-api-virtualenv" ],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This list is missing rudder-inventory-ldap in all versions

@peckpeck
Copy link
Member Author

PR updated

@peckpeck peckpeck force-pushed the ust_7702/create_files_to_hold_release_informations branch from 74410c5 to 07c097c Compare December 30, 2015 17:15
@peckpeck
Copy link
Member Author

PR updated

@peckpeck peckpeck force-pushed the ust_7702/create_files_to_hold_release_informations branch from 07c097c to e8f50c2 Compare December 30, 2015 17:25
jooooooon added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2015
…elease_informations

Fixes #7702: Create files to hold release informations
@jooooooon jooooooon merged commit c1bab3c into Normation:master Dec 30, 2015
@peckpeck peckpeck deleted the ust_7702/create_files_to_hold_release_informations branch May 31, 2016 13:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants