Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #5667: correct the compliance computation logic for aggregates #644

Conversation

fanf
Copy link
Member

@fanf fanf commented Oct 21, 2014

No description provided.

}).mkString(", "))
// println((for(i <- 1 to num) yield {
// rs.getString(i)
// }).mkString(", "))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are you sure you want to comment that ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, yes, it should be removed or not appears in build output. But that must be an other ticket

@ncharles
Copy link
Member

ok for me, except the question on the commenting of the 3 lines.

@fanf fanf force-pushed the ust_5293/5296/5667_bug_in_compliance_computation_logic branch from bbe9c83 to adf43aa Compare October 21, 2014 17:41
ncharles added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2014
…e_computation_logic

Fixes #5667: correct the compliance computation logic for aggregates
@ncharles ncharles merged commit 1f08c51 into Normation:master Oct 22, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants