Version 1.0

[Nyholm]

I suggest version 0.4.0 should be the last release before 1.0.

Anything else we need to add or remove?

[Zegnat]

We can take a final pass through all the public methods we expose. If all of them are described by external interfaces, I think we have now gotten to a fully stable public API.

Since we aren’t planning to add random methods of our own invention here, any bugs can still be fixed under version 1.0.0 but it does communicate that the API is done.

Should #49 set the upcoming “unreleased” to 1.0.0 to make this a promise?

[Nyholm]

That is my intention but I want to "play it safe" and do 0.4.0 first.

[Nyholm]

Hm.. With a second thought...
After we merge #60, could you do a check if all methods actually are described by an interface. If so, lets do 1.0.0 =)

[Nyholm]

Blocked by #65 and #66

[Zegnat]

Hmm, I have no ideas what files I have and have not been involved with now. Should I try to find out to add @author markers? Do those markers add to the final line count?

[Nyholm]

I fixed that in #69

[Nyholm]

Are we ready for tagging 1.0?

[Zegnat]

I opened #71 because I noticed that when reviewing a PR… but otherwise I think we are set!

[Nyholm]

Should I tag the release now?

[Zegnat]

Do whatever you want with #72 and then go for it 👍 Anything else will simply be future work. I think these last 2 days have done enough streamlining!

[Nyholm]

#72 is just meta. That could be handled later.

[Nyholm]

Wohoo