New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MOD] mrp_operations_extension #162
Conversation
1c44173
to
a652921
Compare
daca8f3
to
3ec6c5f
Compare
👎 You shouldn't remove this option. They are not readonly when you mark custom_data, so no issue at all. |
Could be it's not a technical issue but functional issue. Check is making necesary more code to control and it's not improving Manufacturing experts... could you give you opinion on this? El 11 nov. 2016 0:42, "Pedro M. Baeza" notifications@github.com escribió:
|
@anajuaristi, the only to control if the route has specific data is through that check, and you were one of the defenders of that option for your use cases, so I don't understand why you change your mind now. |
No. I wasn't |
Thinking about this, maybe make check active by default (so editable line ) would be enough This way we improve usability withouth loosing functionality. |
OK, change the default and repair Travis. |
Ok @pedrobaeza |
3ec6c5f
to
791d5f4
Compare
Thanks for the changes. Travis is still red I'm afraid. |
Yes, I know, mrp_production_estimated_cost test is failing. I still don't know why |
@esthermm Is this still relevant? are you going to finish the work? Thanks. |
@lreficent it's solved. I'm closing. |
There is an issue about adding an element to the workcenter lines, there is an onchange that fills the fields with the values, but as they are readonly when you save the changes of those fields are not saved. So custom_data field is not necessary.