Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[13.0][IMP] stock_storage_type: allow to archive storage types/locations #195

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2021
Merged

[13.0][IMP] stock_storage_type: allow to archive storage types/locations #195

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2021

Conversation

carlosserratoro
Copy link

  • Usual field added.
  • Simple tests added, to keep the coverage.
  • Filter added to show the archived records.

* Usual field added.
* Simple tests added, to keep the coverage.
* Filter added to show the archived records.
@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 13.0-ocabot-merge-pr-195-by-simahawk-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 81374fa into OCA:13.0 Mar 15, 2021
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 7292d31. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

kv1612 pushed a commit to kv1612/partner-contact that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2021
Pull OCA#195 for OCA/wms was created to be able to archive records of
stock.location.storage.type and stock.package.storage.type. There
are certain records (detailed below) that need to be archived in
the integration and production systems, thus their records defined
in the cosanum_base_data have to be removed. Not only those records,
but also the records that depend on them only.

Records to archive, thus to remove from the cosanum_base_data:
- Package storage type:
  - Liquid Shelf Box
  - Dangerous goods
- Location storage type:
  - HRL Liquid Shelving
  - Dangerous goods

Jira Card: BSCOS-2208
OCA PR: OCA/wms#195
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants