We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, for the following formula,
(set-logic UF) (declare-sort S0 0) (assert (forall ((q2 Bool) (q3 S0) (q4 S0) (q5 S0) (q6 S0) (q7 Bool)) (not (distinct true true false false false true true true)))) (check-sat)
Alt-Ergo SMT-COMP 2020 version (https://www.starexec.org/starexec/secure/details/solver.jsp?id=28859) yields unsat,
unsat
But both cvc4 and z3 return sat.
sat
Command: --no-locs-in-answers --threads-number=1 -i smtlib2
--no-locs-in-answers --threads-number=1 -i smtlib2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(set-logic NIA) (assert (not (exists ((q0 Int) (q1 Bool)) (distinct false false true false)))) (check-sat)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hello @rainoftime , Thanks to point out this bug, it has recently been fixed in #343.
No branches or pull requests
Hi, for the following formula,
Alt-Ergo SMT-COMP 2020 version (https://www.starexec.org/starexec/secure/details/solver.jsp?id=28859) yields
unsat
,But both cvc4 and z3 return
sat
.Command:
--no-locs-in-answers --threads-number=1 -i smtlib2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: