Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP detect: add option to reenable flow actions #11840

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Add an option to allow rules like pass tls ... to be considered app-layer instead of pkt. This will turn the actions into flow actions.

Ticket: #7284.

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2066

Add an option to allow rules like `pass tls ...` to be considered
`app-layer` instead of `pkt`. This will turn the actions into flow
actions.

Ticket: OISF#7284.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.56%. Comparing base (45eb7e4) to head (3755057).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #11840      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.60%   82.56%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         912      912              
  Lines      249351   249359       +8     
==========================================
- Hits       205965   205882      -83     
- Misses      43386    43477      +91     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 60.42% <87.50%> (-0.18%) ⬇️
livemode 18.73% <87.50%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
pcap 44.14% <87.50%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
suricata-verify 62.03% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 58.94% <87.50%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 22887

Copy link
Member

@inashivb inashivb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We seem to be missing a suricata.yaml.in and perhaps two doc updates, one documenting this change in behavior, another one talking about how to go back to previous behavior w this setting.

Q bc its draft: Could you please tell what are you expecting on this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants