Flowhash livedev 5270 v2 #7950
Closed
Flowhash livedev 5270 v2 #7950
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Meaning that we support 65535 live devices at the most
For easier reasoning about the code
So that in a setup with different interfaces capturing different networks, flows do not get mixed up Ticket: OISF#5270
catenacyber
force-pushed
the
flowhash-livedev-5270-v2
branch
from
0a60140
to
96e93e2
Compare
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7950 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 82.19% 82.19%
=======================================
Files 949 949
Lines 273740 273759 +19
=======================================
+ Hits 224998 225023 +25
+ Misses 48742 48736 -6
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
|
WARNING:
Pipeline 9737 |
|
Continued in #7972 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/5270
Describe changes:
Should it be optional ? Ie does suricata support having 2 interfaces monitoring the same network (and flows) ?
Modifies #7386 with needed rebase after merge of #7861